<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lochgelly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lochgelly.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk</link>
	<description>Loch of Shining Waters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mossmorran WInd Turbines Approved by Lochgelly</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/mossmorran-wind-turbines-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-6037</link>
		<dc:creator>Lochgelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8603#comment-6037</guid>
		<description>Thanks for letting us know, we&#039;ll ask around and see what we can find out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting us know, we&#8217;ll ask around and see what we can find out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mossmorran WInd Turbines Approved by lone_piper</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/mossmorran-wind-turbines-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-6034</link>
		<dc:creator>lone_piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8603#comment-6034</guid>
		<description>Anybody else noticed the colour of &quot;steam&quot; being emitted by Mossmorran this morning. The &quot;steam&quot; was a lot darker than normal and was from every part of the various structures. I didn&#039;t have my camera this morning so couldn&#039;t take a photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody else noticed the colour of &#8220;steam&#8221; being emitted by Mossmorran this morning. The &#8220;steam&#8221; was a lot darker than normal and was from every part of the various structures. I didn&#8217;t have my camera this morning so couldn&#8217;t take a photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lochgelly Centre &#8211; Official Reopening (images) by Lochgelly</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/lochgelly-centre-official-reopening-images/comment-page-1/#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>Lochgelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8610#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>It was a good turnout, after the ring, 2 gymnasts done a similar performance from the ceiling inside the centre. We couldn&#039;t get any photographs though because it was too packed to get inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good turnout, after the ring, 2 gymnasts done a similar performance from the ceiling inside the centre. We couldn&#8217;t get any photographs though because it was too packed to get inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lochgelly Centre &#8211; Official Reopening (images) by chbeveridge</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/lochgelly-centre-official-reopening-images/comment-page-1/#comment-6031</link>
		<dc:creator>chbeveridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8610#comment-6031</guid>
		<description>Great turnout, missed it myself as had to be in Edinburgh but got back just in time to see the gymnast on the ringl Lucky her muscles were working hard or she would have been frozen.

Christine B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great turnout, missed it myself as had to be in Edinburgh but got back just in time to see the gymnast on the ringl Lucky her muscles were working hard or she would have been frozen.</p>
<p>Christine B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Council knew possible health risks of Little Raith by Lochgelly</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/01/community-council-knew-health-risks-of-little-raith/comment-page-1/#comment-6029</link>
		<dc:creator>Lochgelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8162#comment-6029</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, we&#039;ve made a reply at: http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/questions-tconcerning-little-raith-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-6028</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, we&#8217;ve made a reply at: <a href="http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/questions-tconcerning-little-raith-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-6028" rel="nofollow">http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/questions-tconcerning-little-raith-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-6028</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions concerning Little Raith Wind Farm by Lochgelly</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/questions-tconcerning-little-raith-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-6028</link>
		<dc:creator>Lochgelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8214#comment-6028</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the information, none of our group has heard any information, and as far as we&#039;re aware the community council, were not consulted either.

We did a search and found the following: http://www.airvolution-projects.com/AirvolutionData/projectDetails.asp

They state the application was passed in January 2011 but I think that was a typo and they mean 2012.

Thank you for the information, as far as we are aware, we have been kept in the dark about this development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the information, none of our group has heard any information, and as far as we&#8217;re aware the community council, were not consulted either.</p>
<p>We did a search and found the following: <a href="http://www.airvolution-projects.com/AirvolutionData/projectDetails.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.airvolution-projects.com/AirvolutionData/projectDetails.asp</a></p>
<p>They state the application was passed in January 2011 but I think that was a typo and they mean 2012.</p>
<p>Thank you for the information, as far as we are aware, we have been kept in the dark about this development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Council knew possible health risks of Little Raith by Jojo Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/01/community-council-knew-health-risks-of-little-raith/comment-page-1/#comment-6025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8162#comment-6025</guid>
		<description>Two 100 metre wind turbines have just been approved as a delegated decision - ie it never went to Committee - beside the Mossmorran Works. Were the local communities consulted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two 100 metre wind turbines have just been approved as a delegated decision &#8211; ie it never went to Committee &#8211; beside the Mossmorran Works. Were the local communities consulted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions concerning Little Raith Wind Farm by Jojo Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/questions-tconcerning-little-raith-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8214#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Two 100 metre wind turbines have just been approved as a delegated decision - ie it never went to Committee - beside the Mossmorran Works. Were the local communities consulted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two 100 metre wind turbines have just been approved as a delegated decision &#8211; ie it never went to Committee &#8211; beside the Mossmorran Works. Were the local communities consulted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Wind Farm for Kelty, Cowdenbeath, Lumphinnans and Lochgelly by Lochgelly</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/industrial-wind-farm-for-kelty-cowdenbeath-lumphinnans-and-lochgelly/comment-page-1/#comment-6018</link>
		<dc:creator>Lochgelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8437#comment-6018</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment, I&#039;ll pass on the event details to SPOT Fife (they will probably already know it), and we will try to get along to the event as well. Thanks for the comment and info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment, I&#8217;ll pass on the event details to SPOT Fife (they will probably already know it), and we will try to get along to the event as well. Thanks for the comment and info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Wind Farm for Kelty, Cowdenbeath, Lumphinnans and Lochgelly by Peter Adams</title>
		<link>http://lochgelly.org.uk/2012/02/industrial-wind-farm-for-kelty-cowdenbeath-lumphinnans-and-lochgelly/comment-page-1/#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lochgelly.org.uk/?p=8437#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>As the planning application for an 80 metre annenometer mast to test wind speeds is only a temporary structure then Fife Council will not object. However as it takes some time between the construction of the annenometer and the application for the turbines (three years is quoted above) it gives people time to get their objections in place to submit to council when the real planning application starts. It is good to see you have already started that process.
I am glad you definitely agree that there should be a moratorium on all wind farm developments, which was recently proposed by Councillor Alex Rowley. It is good to see Alex supporting the policy proposed and included in UKIPScotland manifesto at last years Scottish election. It&#039;s just a pity more of you didn&#039;t support the policy then, but UKIP are used to other parties eventually catching up with their policies.
Why not come along and join fellow Fifers with similar concerns to you at St Andrews on 1st March  for the  &quot;Is Wind the Answer?&quot; event http://is.gd/jFDYJV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the planning application for an 80 metre annenometer mast to test wind speeds is only a temporary structure then Fife Council will not object. However as it takes some time between the construction of the annenometer and the application for the turbines (three years is quoted above) it gives people time to get their objections in place to submit to council when the real planning application starts. It is good to see you have already started that process.<br />
I am glad you definitely agree that there should be a moratorium on all wind farm developments, which was recently proposed by Councillor Alex Rowley. It is good to see Alex supporting the policy proposed and included in UKIPScotland manifesto at last years Scottish election. It&#8217;s just a pity more of you didn&#8217;t support the policy then, but UKIP are used to other parties eventually catching up with their policies.<br />
Why not come along and join fellow Fifers with similar concerns to you at St Andrews on 1st March  for the  &#8220;Is Wind the Answer?&#8221; event <a href="http://is.gd/jFDYJV" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/jFDYJV</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

